IBENSelection methodology
Clear criteria. Considered recognition.
Understand what IBEN looks for, how evidence is reviewed, and what a recognition decision does — and does not — mean.
THE APPROACH
The work comes first.
IBEN’s methodology is designed to assess the evidence a professional provides within their chosen category. Different disciplines need different context; no single visual style or social audience defines excellence.
The framework below describes the intended assessment process. Programme-specific intake dates, reviewer details and any additional requirements will be published when confirmed.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
What we look for.
Craft & Technical Skill
Control, precision and techniques appropriate to the category.
Portfolio Quality
Clear, relevant examples that demonstrate the professional’s own contribution.
Transformation Quality
Quality of outcomes, with context and truthful before-and-after presentation where applicable.
Professional Experience
Relevant experience and depth of practice, considered in context.
Consistency of Work
Evidence of repeatable quality across more than one selected piece.
Specialisation
Depth of knowledge and a clear point of view within the chosen discipline.
Professional Conduct
Honest representation, respectful practice and attention to professional responsibilities.
SIX CONSIDERED STAGES
From introduction to recognition.
- 01
Application / Nomination
Share your experience, specialisation and a portfolio that represents your own work.
- 02
Eligibility Review
Information is checked for completeness, professional relevance and category fit.
- 03
Portfolio Review
Selected work is assessed for technique, consistency and authenticity.
- 04
Professional Evaluation
Further context or an interview may be requested to understand your practice.
- 05
Selection
A final review considers the evidence against the published criteria.
- 06
Recognition
Selected professionals are notified and an IBEN recognition record is published.
Portfolio authenticity
Applicants should identify their own contribution, obtain image permissions and disclose material retouching or generated imagery. Original files, additional context or evidence of authorship may be requested. An image alone is not proof of professional work.
Conflicts of interest
Relevant personal, financial and professional relationships should be disclosed. Reviewers with a material conflict should step aside from the affected assessment. Selection should follow documented evidence and the programme criteria.
Professional evaluation
A conversation or further information may be requested to clarify experience, technique or portfolio context. Not every applicant will progress to every stage. A request for more information is not a selection decision.
Final review & corrections
Final review considers the complete assessment before recognition is issued. Concerns about accuracy, authenticity or a published record can be raised through professional support with relevant evidence.
THE NEXT CHAPTER STARTS WITH YOUR CRAFT
Your work deserves
to be seen.
Put your work forward, or nominate a professional
whose craft deserves recognition.